The boundary
For fully self-hosted deployments the split shifts further toward you, because the control plane itself runs on your infrastructure. Talk to us about the on-premise specification if that is your requirement.
What this means for your certification
The common assumption is that adding a platform vendor drags a large new area into audit scope. For Ankra that is not the case, for three specific reasons.Ankra is not your hosting sub-service organisation
Your cloud or hosting provider remains the sub-service organisation for infrastructure controls - physical security, environmental controls, hypervisor isolation, hardware disposal. Ankra does not replace them, does not sit underneath them, and does not inherit their control set. Adding Ankra does not change which infrastructure provider your assessor examines, and does not add a second one. Ankra enters your programme as a supplier providing a management service, assessed the same way you would assess a CI/CD vendor or an infrastructure-as-code tool.Ankra is not in your data path
The agent is a control-plane client, not a proxy or sidecar. It does not terminate your application traffic, mount your application volumes, or connect to your databases. Your regulated data does not flow through Ankra, which keeps Ankra out of the control families that govern data processing, residency and transfer for that data. What Ankra does hold is described precisely in Data Handling: cluster and workload metadata, credentials you deliberately store, audit events, and AI chat transcripts.Ankra is not in your availability path
If the Ankra control plane is unreachable, your clusters keep running and keep serving traffic. Workloads are unaffected, the Kubernetes control plane is unaffected, and the agent buffers what it cannot send and replays it when the connection recovers. What pauses is reconciliation and platform visibility, not your service. This matters for availability-related criteria: an Ankra outage is a management outage, not a production one, and it does not belong in the same category as your hosting provider going down.Where Ankra appears in your audit
Rather than a broad scope expansion, expect Ankra to surface at these specific points.What Ankra does not do for your compliance
Being explicit about the limits is more useful than a long list of claims.- Ankra does not certify your environment. The platform produces evidence about your clusters. An assessor still decides whether your controls are effective.
- Ankra does not make your workloads compliant. Application-layer controls, data handling inside your services, and your own SDLC remain yours.
- Ankra does not replace your hosting provider’s attestations. You still collect those separately.
- Ankra is not a substitute for your ISMS. The platform is one control among many, and the compliance report is input to your programme, not the programme itself.
- Using Ankra does not by itself satisfy any control. It gives you the mechanism and the evidence; you still need the policy and the review cadence around them.
Ankra’s own security programme
Ankra runs its own information security management system, and the honest status of that work - certifications held, controls implemented, and what is still in progress - is published and kept current at ankra.ai/trust. Sub-processors and hosting providers are listed there too.Related
Security at Ankra
The trust model this responsibility split sits inside.
Agent Compliance Posture
Control-by-control scope determination for the cluster agent.
Data Handling
Exactly what the control plane stores.
Compliance Management
Generate the evidence an assessor asks for.